The Analytical Writing section of the GRE is more than a test of writing ability it is a direct measure of how effectively a candidate can think, analyze, and present a logical argument within a limited time. For students aiming for admission into competitive graduate programs, securing a strong score in this section is essential. A score above 4.5 is often viewed as an indicator of a student’s readiness for the rigours of postgraduate study, where clarity of thought and structured communication are critical.
With recent changes to the GRE format, the GRE Analytical Writing Assessment (AWA) now consists of a single task: Analyze an Issue. Test-takers are given 30 minutes to respond to a prompt by developing a clear and reasoned perspective on a given topic. This task demands more than quick thinking it requires a structured approach to writing, a strong command of language, and the ability to articulate ideas under pressure.
Students who perform well in this section typically follow a consistent strategy. They write between 500 to 600 words, organize their thoughts into 4 to 5 coherent paragraphs, and ensure that every sentence contributes meaningfully to the argument. Reviewing high-scoring sample essays and analyzing GRE Analytical Writing examples are proven methods to better understand the expectations of the exam.
In this blog, we will cover three key areas:
- An overview of the GRE Analytical Writing section and its significance
- Actionable tips for crafting a high-scoring essay
- A full-length essay example that reflects the structure, tone, and depth required to succeed
Whether you are just beginning your GRE preparation or working to strengthen a specific area, this guide is designed to help you approach the AWA section with clarity and confidence.
An Overview of the GRE Analytical Writing Section and Its Significance
The Analytical Writing section of the GRE is designed to assess how well a candidate can articulate complex ideas, evaluate arguments, and construct logical and coherent written responses. Although the Quantitative and Verbal sections often receive greater focus during test preparation, the GRE Analytical Writing Assessment (AWA) remains a crucial element, particularly for graduate and professional programs that emphasize critical thinking, reasoning, and communication skills.
The AWA measures a student’s ability to analyze an issue from multiple perspectives and express their viewpoint in a structured and persuasive manner. Graduate-level education frequently involves drafting research papers, writing persuasive essays, and presenting arguments supported by evidence. As such, performance on this section is viewed as a reliable indicator of a student’s readiness for academic writing and analytical reasoning.
Purpose and Structure of the Section
The current GRE AWA includes a single writing task: the “Analyze an Issue” essay. Test-takers are given a topic and asked to take a clear position, support it with relevant reasoning and examples, and consider different aspects of the issue. The time limit for this task is 30 minutes, during which the candidate must plan, write, and revise their essay.
A strong response is expected to follow a logical structure and demonstrate effective use of language. Typically, a well-organized essay includes:
- Introduction: States the issue and clearly presents the writer’s position.
- Body Paragraphs: Develop the central argument with logical reasoning, relevant examples, and, where appropriate, a consideration of alternative viewpoints.
- Conclusion: Reinforces the position and summarizes the main points presented.
An essay in the AWA section usually ranges between 500 to 600 words, divided into four or five coherent paragraphs.
Understanding the “Analyze an Issue” Task
The essay prompt presents a broad statement or opinion on a topic of general interest. Candidates are expected to evaluate the issue, decide on a stance, and develop an argument supported by reasoning and evidence. Prompts typically fall under themes such as:
- Technology and Society – Addressing the impact of innovation on individual behaviour or societal values
- Education – Comparing the effectiveness of various learning approaches or policies
- Government and Policy – Discussing the responsibilities of governing bodies in addressing public concerns
- Arts and Culture – Exploring the significance of creativity and expression in shaping a community
Success in this task depends on a writer’s ability to present a position clearly, support it effectively, and organize ideas in a logical sequence.
Scoring Criteria and Evaluation Process
Essays are scored on a scale of 0 to 6, in half-point increments, by both a trained human evaluator and a computer-based scoring engine. These scores are averaged to determine the final score. The criteria considered during the evaluation include:
- Clarity of Ideas: How clearly the argument is presented and supported
- Logical Organization: The flow and structure of the essay, including the use of transitions
- Language Usage: Grammar, vocabulary, sentence construction, and overall control of written English
- Development and Support: The strength and relevance of examples and supporting details
In addition to the score, it is important to understand the weight each level carries. The table below outlines what each score range represents:
| GRE AWA Score | Explanation |
| 6.0 – Outstanding | Demonstrates insightful analysis, clear and logical organization, and strong language skills with minimal errors. |
| 5.0 – Strong | Presents thoughtful analysis with well-organized ideas and minor language flaws. |
| 4.0 – Adequate | Provides satisfactory insight and structure, but may lack depth or contain noticeable language issues. |
| 3.0 – Limited | Offers limited reasoning and organization with frequent language and structural errors. |
| 2.0 – Seriously Flawed | Fails to demonstrate understanding of the task; poorly organized with significant language and analytical issues. |
| 1.0 – Fundamentally Deficient | Lacks a coherent response; riddled with severe errors in reasoning, grammar, and structure. |
| 0.0 – Unscorable | The response is off-topic, incomprehensible, written in a language other than English, or left blank. |
GRE Analytical Writing Score Availability and Validity
Test-takers can expect their AWA scores to be available on the ETS official website approximately 8 to 10 days after taking the GRE. The score remains valid for five years from the test date. Candidates are encouraged to plan ahead and send their scores to their selected institutions within this timeframe to meet application deadlines and admission requirements.
Actionable Tips for Crafting a High-Scoring Essay
Crafting a top-tier GRE Analytical Writing essay is not about writing more it’s about writing with precision, purpose, and persuasion. The evaluators aren’t looking for perfection; they’re looking for control: over your argument, your structure, and your language. Below are focused, high-impact strategies that go beyond the basics to help you write like a test-taker who understands exactly what the GRE is evaluating.
1. Strategic Pre-Writing: Think Like an Evaluator Before You Write
Many essays fall short not because of poor writing, but because the writer rushes into drafting without fully unpacking the prompt. High-scoring essays start with strong intellectual preparation.
- Deconstruct the Prompt: Don’t just read the topic interrogate it. What assumptions are being made? What are the real-world implications? This step separates superficial responses from analytical ones.
- Select a Position with Strategic Depth: Choose a stance that allows for layered reasoning. A nuanced position (not always the extreme) gives you more space to present depth, consider counterpoints, and still defend your claim with clarity.
- Build an Argument Map, Not Just an Outline: Organize your thoughts into a logical progression: thesis → key claims → evidence → anticipated counterarguments. Your plan should reflect how your ideas will unfold and connect, not just what they are.
2. Argument Construction: Prioritize Depth Over Breadth
Examiners are not impressed by the number of examples or paragraphs they’re impressed by how deliberately each one is used.
- Develop, Don’t List: One strong, well-developed example is more impactful than three weak or shallow ones. Aim for relevance, specificity, and depth. Explain why the example matters in the context of your argument.
- Integrate Counterpoints Strategically: Acknowledge opposing viewpoints but don’t let them derail your stance. Briefly present a counterargument only to dismantle it using reasoning or stronger evidence. This showcases your critical thinking.
- Each Paragraph Should Earn Its Place: Every paragraph must serve a purpose. Either it advances your argument or anticipates and addresses an objection. Avoid filler; think in terms of argumentative value.
3. Execution Under Pressure: Write With Control, Not Speed
Under a 30-minute time constraint, clarity and control outweigh complexity. Focus on crafting a response that is structurally tight and intellectually confident.
- Introduction = Framing, Not Fluff: Your introduction should not attempt to impress with vocabulary it should frame the issue, establish context, and clearly state your position. Aim for 3-4 impactful sentences that set the tone and direction.
- Body = Argument Engine: Each body paragraph should start with a clear topic sentence that links directly back to your thesis. Use transitional phrases (“Moreover,” “For instance,” “Conversely”) to maintain momentum and coherence.
- Conclusion = Final Reinforcement: Restate your thesis in fresh words and summarize your most compelling argument. Avoid introducing new points. Your goal here is to leave the evaluator with a sense of closure and conviction.
4. Polishing for Precision: Edit As Your Score Depends on It (Because It Does)
The final minutes of your essay are not for overhauls they’re for refinement. A polished response reflects attention to detail and care in execution.
- Scan for Disruptors: Look out for sentences that are unclear, repetitive, or off-track. Trim or rephrase them for conciseness and clarity.
- Eliminate Language Clutter: Replace vague words (“things,” “stuff,” “many people believe”) with precise language. Examiners reward specificity and control over word choice.
- Correct, Don’t Rewrite: Focus on quick grammatical fixes, verb agreement, article usage, and spelling. You won’t have time for major edits go for fast, high-impact adjustments.
5. Calibrated Practice: Train Like It’s Test Day
Finally, no tip substitutes consistent, deliberate practice. But how you practice matters.
- Simulate Real Conditions: Use official GRE Issue prompts. Time yourself strictly to 30 minutes, and practice typing on a computer if that’s how you’ll take the test.
- Evaluate With the Rubric in Mind: After each essay, use the ETS scoring criteria to assess your own writing. Better yet, ask a peer to review your work with the same framework.
- Track Patterns in Your Mistakes: Are your introductions too vague? Are your examples too generic? Find the weak links and make targeted improvements.
A high-scoring GRE AWA essay doesn’t require brilliance it requires discipline. It’s about breaking down complex issues, building persuasive arguments under time pressure, and polishing your expression with purpose. Follow these strategies with intention, and you’ll not only improve your score you’ll also stand out to admissions committees looking for sharp, critical thinkers ready for graduate-level work.
A Full-Length Essay Example That Reflects the Structure, Tone, and Depth Required to Succeed
Succeeding in the GRE Issue Task requires more than just good grammar or lengthy writing it demands a clear position, well-structured reasoning, and insightful analysis. The essay below exemplifies what a high-scoring (5.5–6.0) response looks like, reflecting the depth, tone, and logical precision expected by GRE evaluators. It tackles a thought-provoking prompt with clarity, critical thinking, and diverse, well-integrated examples.
Prompt:
“Leaders are created by the demands that are placed on them, not by their desire to lead.”
Essay:
Leadership, often romanticized as a trait possessed by visionaries and born reformers, is more accurately defined by the circumstances that shape an individual’s response to pressure, uncertainty, and responsibility. While the desire to lead may motivate an individual to pursue leadership roles, it is ultimately the complexity and urgency of real-world challenges that cultivate the mindset, resilience, and decisions that define a true leader. This essay argues that it is external demands, rather than personal ambition, that play the dominant role in the making of effective leaders.
Historical and contemporary examples suggest that some of the most impactful leaders rose to the occasion not by chasing influence but by responding to crises that demanded action. Consider Abraham Lincoln, whose presidency was forged in the crucible of the American Civil War. Although Lincoln had political aspirations, it was the national crisis—fractured identity, civil conflict, and moral urgency around slavery—that forced him to mature rapidly as a leader. The Emancipation Proclamation, arguably one of the most morally and politically courageous acts in U.S. history, was not merely the result of personal desire, but a direct response to the pressure of preserving a nation on the brink of collapse.
Similarly, in the corporate realm, Satya Nadella’s leadership at Microsoft demonstrates how modern demands can shape leadership style and priorities. Nadella’s elevation to CEO coincided with a period of stagnation and cultural inertia within the company. Under intense scrutiny and competitive pressure, he steered the company toward cloud computing, encouraged a growth mindset, and overhauled the internal culture. His effectiveness was not just a product of wanting the role, but of being forced to solve entrenched problems with fresh thinking and strategic risk-taking.
The argument that desire alone is insufficient becomes more evident when we consider leaders who were driven purely by ambition but failed when faced with actual demands. Many populist figures around the world ascend to power on a wave of rhetoric and self-confidence, yet flounder in crisis situations. Their inability to navigate real-time problems—economic downturns, pandemics, geopolitical conflict—exposes the gap between aspiration and execution. Desire may provide a spark, but pressure and accountability forge the steel of leadership.
That said, it would be reductive to discount ambition entirely. The desire to lead can act as a prerequisite for seeking out opportunities or preparing oneself intellectually and emotionally. Without some inner drive, individuals may never position themselves where leadership is even an option. However, desire is preparatory at best. It is not a substitute for adaptability, ethical clarity, and the ability to make unpopular but necessary decisions under pressure all of which are developed through real-world demands.
Furthermore, emerging research in psychology and organizational behavior supports the idea that leadership is largely situational. The “Situational Leadership Theory” introduced by Paul Hersey and Ken Blanchard suggests that effective leadership depends on responding flexibly to the maturity and needs of followers, as well as the demands of the environment. This model directly contradicts the idea that leadership is primarily about internal ambition. It reinforces the principle that adaptability under external pressure, rather than internal desire, determines leadership success.
In conclusion, while the desire to lead may inspire individuals to step forward, it is the contextual demands placed upon them—by history, society, or circumstance—that ultimately shape who becomes a capable and transformative leader. Those demands test character, force decisions, and sharpen judgment in a way no self-driven ambition ever could. In this sense, leaders are less the authors of their own narratives and more the products of the challenges they are called to address.
Why This Essay Works:
| Category | Score Explanation (6.0-Level) |
| Clarity & Structure | The essay follows a logical progression: introduction, body with multiple nuanced points, and a powerful conclusion. |
| Critical Thinking | It evaluates both sides: and acknowledges the role of desire, but builds a stronger case for demand-driven leadership. |
| Use of Examples | Blends historical (Lincoln), corporate (Nadella), and conceptual (Situational Leadership Theory) examples for depth. |
| Language & Tone | Academic, formal, and precise — without unnecessary complexity. Sentences are varied, and transitions are seamless. |
| Depth & Relevance | Tackles a complex, abstract prompt with original insight and relevant analysis. Avoids oversimplification. |
Understanding a Low-Scoring GRE Analytical Writing Essay
What a Weak Response Looks Like and Why It Falls Short
After reviewing a well-developed, high-scoring essay that reflects the organization, depth, and critical reasoning expected on the GRE Analytical Writing Issue Task, it is important to now examine a low-scoring essay to understand where and how responses can go wrong.
Students often assume that merely agreeing or disagreeing with a prompt and offering a few examples is sufficient. However, the GRE expects a more sophisticated, analytical approach: articulating complex ideas, supporting points with compelling reasoning or illustrative examples, and considering counterarguments where appropriate.
Prompt:
“The best way to increase the quality of life in a city is to reduce the amount of time people spend commuting.”
Low-Scoring Essay Example
Introduction:
Reducing commuting time is the best way to make life better in a city. It gives people more free time and reduces their stress. People will be happier if they don’t spend so much time in traffic.
Body Paragraph 1:
When people spend less time commuting, they can relax more and do things they like. This makes them happier and less stressed. For example, if people have more free time, they can spend it with their families or do hobbies.
Body Paragraph 2:
Also, reducing commuting time can help the environment. Less traffic means less pollution, which is good for everyone. Cleaner air improves people’s health.
Body Paragraph 3:
However, sometimes people are still unhappy even with less commuting time. Some people may not like their jobs or have other personal problems that affect their happiness.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, reducing commuting time can improve life in a city by giving people more time and reducing pollution. But it’s not the only thing that matters. Other things are important too.
Detailed Analysis: Why This Essay Would Score Low on the GRE
The GRE’s Issue Task evaluates essays based on critical thinking, development of ideas, organization, use of language, and sentence variety. Here is a breakdown of why the above essay likely scores in the 1.5–2.5 range on the official GRE rubric.
1. Lack of Analytical Depth
The most significant weakness is the superficial treatment of the issue. While the writer takes a clear stance, the reasoning lacks nuance or complexity. The essay asserts that reducing commuting time improves the quality of life, but the explanations are vague and lack insight. Statements like “People will be happier” or “Less traffic means less pollution” are true in a general sense, but are not developed with logical progression, data, or meaningful elaboration.
GRE Tip: High-scoring essays explore implications, analyze assumptions, and explain how and why their evidence supports the claim. Merely stating a general opinion does not suffice.
2. Generic and Hypothetical Examples
The essay relies entirely on broad, hypothetical examples (“people can spend time with family,” “people are happier”) without referring to any specific scenarios, statistics, or real-world parallels. There is no mention of cities that have tried reducing commuting times, no data to support claims, and no comparative insight.
GRE Tip: Strong essays do not require obscure knowledge but do benefit from concrete illustrations these could be well-known urban examples, research summaries, or policy outcomes.
3. Repetitive Sentence Structure and Vocabulary
The writing shows minimal variety in syntax and word choice. Phrases such as “people will be happier” and “reducing commuting time” are repeated without stylistic variation. Additionally, sentences are short and mechanically structured, reducing the overall fluency and sophistication of the response.
GRE Tip: Varied sentence structure, academic vocabulary, and clarity of expression contribute to both coherence and style critical for a high score.
4. Weak Counterargument and Integration
The third paragraph attempts to introduce a counterpoint that reduced commuting does not guarantee happiness but it is abrupt, undeveloped, and poorly connected to the essay’s main argument. There is no attempt to integrate this opposing view into a broader discussion or to resolve the tension between competing ideas.
GRE Tip: The best essays acknowledge counterarguments and either refute them logically or incorporate them into a more balanced view, demonstrating intellectual maturity.
5. Conclusion Lacks Purpose and Insight
The conclusion merely repeats points made in the introduction and body without offering any deeper reflection or synthesis. Strong GRE conclusions often reinforce the argument by offering broader insights, such as implications for public policy, social well-being, or long-term urban development.
GRE Tip: Use the conclusion to elevate your argument, not just summarize it. This leaves a lasting impression on the evaluator.
Summary Evaluation Based on GRE Rubric
| Trait | Evaluation |
| Position Clarity | Clear but simplistic |
| Idea Development | Weak, underdeveloped reasoning |
| Support and Evidence | General and hypothetical |
| Organization | Basic structure, but lacks cohesion |
| Language Use | Repetitive, simplistic, minimal variety |
| Grammar and Mechanics | Generally correct but unambitious |
Estimated GRE Score: 2 or 2.5 out of 6
Final Reflection: What This Essay Teaches Us
This essay demonstrates how even a clearly stated opinion can fall short when it is unsupported, repetitive, and analytically weak. On the GRE, depth of thought and clarity of argumentation matter more than simply agreeing or disagreeing with a prompt.
By contrast, high-scoring responses:
- Engage deeply with the issue.
- Provide nuanced reasoning.
- Offer specific, illustrative support.
- Demonstrate control over language and organization.
Conclusion
Mastering the GRE Analytical Writing section is a pivotal step toward achieving a competitive score and securing admission into top graduate programs. By understanding the structure and expectations of the “Analyze an Issue” task, applying strategic tips to craft a persuasive and well-organized essay, and studying high-scoring examples, you can transform this challenging component of the GRE into an opportunity to showcase your critical thinking and writing abilities. A score above 4.5 not only enhances your overall GRE performance but also signals to admissions committees your readiness for the intellectual demands of graduate-level work. With disciplined practice and a clear approach, success in this section is well within your reach.
At The Princeton Review Singapore, we are committed to helping you achieve your highest potential on the GRE, including the Analytical Writing section. With over 40 years of experience guiding more than 10 million students worldwide, our proven 8-step GRE prep course offers a comprehensive and tailored approach to test preparation. Whether you choose in-person or online live classes with US-certified trainers, you’ll benefit from 40 hours of expert tutoring, regular full-length mock tests every 15 days, and access to extensive study materials, including proprietary GRE books and over 120 hours of monitored practice. Our program also includes booster sessions in the final 15 days before your test, critical test-day tips, and post-test counseling to ensure you’re fully prepared and supported every step of the way.
Let The Princeton Review Singapore empower you to conquer the GRE and take confident strides toward your graduate school goals.