The GMAT Verbal section is a crucial component of the exam, evaluating a candidate’s ability to think critically, assess arguments, and apply logical reasoning skills essential for success in graduate management programs. Critical Reasoning (CR) questions, which make up a significant portion of this section, require test-takers to analyze arguments, identify assumptions, and determine how new information strengthens or weakens a given claim. With 23 questions to complete in 45 minutes and a score range of 60–90, proficiency in CR can significantly impact overall performance. A strong grasp of assumptions, strengtheners, and weakeners is key to excelling in this area. This guide provides a structured approach to mastering CR concepts, offering practical strategies, in-depth explanations, and targeted techniques to enhance accuracy and efficiency.
Why Critical Reasoning Matters on the GMAT
Critical Reasoning questions constitute a significant portion of the Verbal section. These questions present a brief argument, typically two to four sentences, followed by a question that requires an evaluation of the argument’s logic. Test-takers may need to identify an assumption, find evidence that strengthens or weakens the argument, or assess its reasoning. Since the GMAT is an adaptive test, performance on early questions influences the difficulty level of subsequent questions and the overall score (205–805). Excelling in CR establishes a strong foundation for the Verbal section, which is crucial for a competitive GMAT score.
Breaking Down the Core Concepts
1. Assumptions: The Hidden Foundation of Arguments
An assumption is an unstated premise that connects the argument’s evidence to its conclusion. If the assumption is false, the argument weakens.
How to Identify an Assumption
- Determine the Conclusion and Evidence: The conclusion represents the main claim, often signalled by words such as “therefore,” “thus,” or “so.” The evidence provides the reasoning or data supporting the conclusion.
- Identify the Logical Gap: Ask, “What must be true for this evidence to support this conclusion?” The assumption bridges this gap.
- Use the Negation Test: If negating the assumption weakens or invalidates the argument, it is a necessary assumption.
Example
Argument: “A new software increased employee productivity by 15%. Therefore, the software should be adopted company-wide.”
- Conclusion: The software should be implemented across the company.
- Evidence: It increased productivity by 15%.
- Assumption: The 15% productivity increase is significant enough to justify company-wide adoption, and no negative consequences (e.g., high costs or employee dissatisfaction) exist.
- Negation Test: If the productivity increase is insignificant or the software has adverse effects (e.g., excessive costs), the argument weakens.
Practice Tip
Before reviewing answer choices, write down the conclusion, evidence, and a potential assumption. This reduces the likelihood of being misled by incorrect answer choices.
2. Strengtheners: Supporting the Argument
A strengthener reinforces the argument by confirming its assumption or providing additional supporting evidence.
How to Identify a Strengthener
- Address the Assumption: A strong answer choice makes the assumption more likely to be true.
- Introduce Supporting Evidence: It provides new information that aligns with the conclusion.
- Eliminate Alternative Explanations: A strengthener may disprove other possible explanations that could weaken the argument.
Example
Argument: “A new software increased employee productivity by 15%. Therefore, the software should be adopted company-wide.”
- Assumption: The productivity increase is significant, and no negative consequences exist.
- Strengthener: “The software’s cost is minimal, and employees reported higher job satisfaction after using it.” This supports the assumption by addressing cost concerns and potential dissatisfaction.
Common Pitfalls
- Irrelevant Information: A strengthener must directly support the conclusion. For example, “The software has a modern design” does not address productivity or company-wide implementation.
- Overly General Statements: A strengthener should specifically reinforce the argument’s assumption, not just provide general support.
3. Weakeners: Challenging the Argument
A weakener introduces doubt by attacking an assumption or providing contradictory evidence.
How to Identify a Weakener
- Challenge the Assumption: The most effective weakeners demonstrate that an assumption is flawed.
- Introduce Alternative Explanations: Weakeners may present another reason for the argument’s evidence.
- Contradict the Conclusion: They provide data that opposes the argument’s claim.
Example
Argument: “A new software increased employee productivity by 15%. Therefore, the software should be adopted company-wide.”
- Assumption: The productivity increase is significant, and no negative consequences exist.
- Weakener: “The software led to a 30% increase in IT support requests due to frequent crashes.” This weakens the argument by introducing a potential drawback.
Common Pitfalls
- Minor Impact: A weakener must significantly challenge the argument. For instance, “The software occasionally freezes” may be a minor issue rather than a critical flaw.
- Out-of-Scope Information: Avoid answer choices that do not directly affect the argument’s reasoning.
Step-by-Step Strategy for Critical Reasoning Questions
- Read the Question Stem First: Identify whether the question requires an assumption, strengthener, or weakener.
- Analyze the Argument:
- Identify the conclusion, evidence, and assumption.
- Paraphrase the argument to ensure clarity.
- Predict the Answer:
- For assumptions: What must be true for the argument to hold?
- For strengtheners: What would make the assumption more likely?
- For weakeners: What would make the assumption less likely?
- Evaluate Answer Choices:
- Eliminate choices that are irrelevant or do not impact the argument logically.
- Apply the negation test for assumption questions.
- Verify the Selection: Ensure the final answer directly addresses the question type.
GMAT Practice Questions
Question 1: Assumption
Argument: “A city introduced a bike-sharing program, and the number of car trips decreased by 10%. Therefore, the bike-sharing program caused the reduction in car trips.”
- Conclusion: The bike-sharing program caused a decrease in car trips.
- Evidence: A 10% reduction in car trips followed the program’s introduction.
- Assumption: No other factors contributed to the decline in car trips.
- Correct Answer: “No other transportation initiatives were introduced during the same period.”
Question 2: Strengthener and Weakener
Argument: “A company’s new training program improved employee retention by 20%. Therefore, the training program should be continued.”
- Assumption: The retention improvement resulted from the training program and is cost-effective.
- Strengthener: “The training program’s costs are low, and employees cited it as a key reason for staying.”
- Weakener: “Employee retention also increased by 20% at a similar company without the training program.”
Tips for Improving Critical Reasoning Performance
- Understand Argument Structures: Recognize common argument types such as cause-and-effect, analogies, and statistical reasoning.
- Practice Under Timed Conditions: Allocate approximately two minutes per CR question.
- Analyze Mistakes: Identify reasoning errors in incorrect answers.
- Use Process of Elimination: Remove choices that are too extreme, irrelevant, or do not match the question type.
- Maintain Focus During the Exam: Manage time effectively and approach each question systematically.
Conclusion
Achieving a high score in the GMAT Verbal section, particularly in Critical Reasoning, requires a structured approach and consistent practice. By mastering argument structures and focusing on assumptions, strengtheners, and weakeners, test-takers can improve their analytical skills and overall performance. A strong GMAT score enhances admission prospects for competitive MBA and graduate management programs, making thorough preparation essential.
Why Choose The Princeton Review Singapore for GMAT Preparation?
For over 40 years, The Princeton Review has been a trusted leader in test preparation, helping more than 10 million students achieve their academic goals. Our comprehensive GMAT prep program is designed to provide structured learning, expert instruction, and proven test-taking strategies to maximize your score.
Program Highlights:
- Live, Instructor-Led Classes – Learn from experienced, US-certified trainers in interactive sessions, available in-person and online.
- Full-Length Mock Tests – Practice with realistic GMAT simulations to develop test-taking strategies and improve performance.
- Comprehensive Study Material – Access proprietary Princeton Review books, online content, and over 120 hours of guided practice.
- Structured Study Plans – Begin with a pre-assessment mock test, followed by a personalized study plan based on performance analysis.
- Regular Assessments – Take bi-weekly evaluation tests to track progress and refine strategies.
- Booster Sessions – Intensive topic-wise assessments and doubt-clearing sessions conducted 15 days before the exam for targeted improvement.
- Test-Day Strategies – Receive expert guidance on managing time effectively, avoiding common mistakes, and approaching the exam with confidence.
- Post-Test Support – Benefit from free counselling sessions with admissions experts and additional support for score improvement.
Take the Next Step
Effective preparation is key to achieving a competitive GMAT score and securing admission to your target business school. The Princeton Review Singapore provides the expertise, resources, and structured approach necessary for success.
Contact us today to learn more about our GMAT prep courses and start your journey toward a strong application.